Richard K. Green, Ph.D., Director of the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate is quoted in the April 16, 2009 edition of the The Economist:
Shelter or Burden? The social benefits of home ownership look more modest than they did and the economic costs much higher
The Economist
...Owning your own roof, walls and fireplace, it is thought, is good for householders because it helps them accumulate wealth. It is good for the economy because it encourages people to save. And it is good for society because homeowners invest more in their neighbourhoods, engage more in civic activities and encourage their children to do better at school than do renters. Home ownership, in short, benefits everyone-not just the homeowner-and the more there is of it, the better. Which is why it is usually encouraged by the government. In America, Ireland and Spain, homeowners can deduct mortgage-interest payments from taxable income.
Yet the worldwide crash was bound up in this supposed miracle of social policy. The disaster began with defaults on American subprime mortgages, a financial instrument designed to spread home ownership among the poor. It gathered pace after the failures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two government-sponsored enterprises that provide cheap home loans. As a result, the home-ownership rate in America has fallen for four years, the first time that has happened in a quarter of a century. In 2008, 2.3m families lost their homes or faced foreclosure-double the average before the crisis-reducing the home-ownership rate from 69% in 2004 to 67.5% at the end of 2008. The number of owner-occupied dwellings also slipped in Britain in 2007-08 for the first time since the 1950s...
..."Perhaps the most compelling argument for housing as a means of wealth accumulation", argues Richard Green of the University of Southern California, "is that it gives households a default mechanism for savings." Because people have to pay off a mortgage, they increase their home equity and save more than they otherwise would. This is indeed a strong argument: social-science research finds that people save more if they do so automatically rather than having to choose to set something aside every month.
(Editor's note: The following link to the source article may only be available for a few days following the publication of this article, or it may only be available for a fee. Please contact the source publication for more information about retrieving the full text of this article.)
April 16, 2009