Healthy employment, a growing population, more millennials entering the market and the high price of single-family homes are expected to push demand for multifamily housing upward and keep homeownership rates low throughout Los Angeles County, according to a new report from Beacon Economics and the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.
“We’re not seeing a lot of single-family home construction. … (The county) is pretty much built-out in terms of single-family availability, and beyond that, demand is coming on the multifamily side,” said USC Lusk Center Director Richard Green, who co-authored the forecast. “I think it’s partly affordability, but more importantly, people aren’t getting married and people who aren’t married prefer to rent. … I think the multifamily fundamentals are very good. We’re back to average (level of construction for multifamily properties).”
Parts of Los Angeles County have already seen a boom in multifamily housing projects, and thousands of units have come online from downtown to Koreatown to Hollywood and the South Bay in recent months. A report from Calabasas-based Marcus & Millichap released this month estimated that 11,000 new apartment units came online in Los Angeles County this year through the third quarter. The county’s economy reached “full employment” in 2017 with a current jobless rate of 4.5 percent, the USC/Beacon report says.
Green indicated that apartments should remain hot at least in part because seven years of economic recovery have not produced a rebound in homeownership.
“As employment and wages improve in the region, homeownership remains stagnant,” Green said in a statement. “This combination is a key stressor in the availability and cost of apartments and has an increasing impact on the local economy.”
The average monthly rent in Los Angeles County is projected to rise by $136 in the next two years. The report says average rent is $2,237 in Los Angeles County with a 3.94 percent vacancy rate. It projects a $2,373 average rent for the county in 2019, with the vacancy rate dropping slightly to 3.91 percent.
The increases come amid a lack of action on the overall housing supply, Christopher Thornberg, co-author of the 2017 USC Casden Economics Forecast and Beacon Economics founding partner, said last week.
“In Southern California there are certain cities clearly doing a lot to expand their housing market, but there are way too many cities doing nothing and, in the end, the kind of ideas of densification and infill development are things the entire region has to focus on – not just a few cities,” Thornberg said.
Thornberg added that the issue is not an affordability problem as the increasing tightness of the labor market is starting to create income growth that take the pressure off of being able to pay rent.
It’s a housing supply problem, he said.
“Two years ago we were short of housing, but still had an excess supply of workers,” Thornberg said. “Now we don’t have enough housing and enough workers and that’s an important shift because wages are going up, but on the other hand, the housing supply crisis is about to have a real impact on the economy” (see related story on consumer confidence survey, page 1).
$27M for Industrial Park
Chicago-based RReef America recently acquired the 157,904-square-foot multi-tenant Fortune Business Park in City of Industry for $27.15 million, or $174.84 per square foot, according to Chicago-based brokerage Jones Lang LaSalle, which helped broker the sale.
The seller, Dallas-based Lincoln Property Co., acquired the office complex in 2006 for $21 million, or $135.23 a square foot.
The property is comprised of seven buildings spread over more than seven acres at 13668 Valley Blvd., near the 605 and 10 freeways. It is fully leased to 12 tenants, JLL said.
Managing directors Bo Mills and Mark Detmer and vice president Ryan Sitov led the JLL team on the sale, the company said.
“This was an excellent opportunity to invest in a large business park developed after 2005 – a rarity for Los Angeles in-fill assets,” Mills said in a statement. “That provided immediate upside potential by lifting rents to current market value.”
A link to the original article can be found here.